Microsoft says virtually nobody was grabbing NYT articles through its chatbot
Microsoft's Copilot rarely reproduces even full sentences from news articles and books, let alone substantive chunks that could substitute for the original, the company says in new legal filings as it fights copyright claims from publishers including The New York Times and book a
Microsoft's latest filings in the copyright lawsuit with The New York Times and other publishers reveal that its AI chatbot, Copilot, is not a significant threat to the original content creators. According to Microsoft, virtually nobody was grabbing NYT articles through its chatbot, suggesting that the company's AI technology is not reproducing substantial portions of copyrighted material. This development has significant implications for the ongoing debate about AI, copyright, and content ownership.
The findings also speak to the current state of AI technology and its limitations. While AI models like Copilot can generate human-like text, they appear to be struggling with reproducing lengthy passages from original sources. This could be due to various factors, including the design of the model, training data, or the inherent difficulties in replicating complex content. As the AI industry continues to evolve, it will be crucial to monitor how these technologies develop and intersect with existing copyright frameworks.
What's next to watch is how this ruling impacts the trajectory of AI development and the conversations around content ownership and copyright. The outcome of this case could set a precedent for how AI companies interact with content creators and may influence future legislation and regulations. Additionally, it will be interesting to see how other AI companies respond to these developments and whether they will adopt similar approaches to mitigate copyright risks.
Originally reported by theverge.com. ProxyNews adds analysis for ai & agent economy readers.